Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Zsombor Piros Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Stebe's recent second serve points win rate is 45.27%, slightly superior to Piros' 43.82%, indicating a potential edge in serve stability.
• On the return game, Stebe outperforms Piros by securing 48.16% of opponent's second serve points compared to Piros' 42.31%. Additionally, their first serve return stats are close, with Stebe at 29.07% and Piros at 28.31%. What might this suggest about Stebe's overall defensive strength?
• When under pressure, Stebe has saved 52.35% of breakpoints, slightly better than Piros' 51.25%, highlighting a marginal advantage in clutch situations.
• Looking at performance over the past year, Piros has a superior win rate at 69.12% compared to Stebe's 66.67%, despite Stebe participating in fewer matches.
• Stebe's strongest surface is indoor hard (62%), while Piros excels most on clay courts with a 67% win rate. How will these surface preferences influence their upcoming match?
• Stebe has participated mainly in Futures tournaments, where he boasts an 83.33% win rate. In contrast, Piros has a 72.13% win rate on the Challenger circuit, demonstrating experience against higher-ranked opponents.
• The average ranking of Stebe's opponents over the past year is 341.38, whereas Piros has faced stronger opposition averaging a rank of 292.53.
• In matches that go to a deciding set, Stebe remains unbeaten in the past year, winning 100% of such scenarios, whereas Piros has won 56% of the time. Can Stebe maintain this decisive performance under critical match circumstances?
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, both players are nearly identical: Stebe has converted 34.34%, while Piros is at 34.95%, highlighting their comparable aggression in critical points during matches.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the six-month performance and style of play of both players, Stebe exhibits superior serve reliability and return capabilities, giving him a slight statistical edge. While Piros has shown better overall consistency and experience against higher-ranked opponents, Stebe's tactical advantage in deciding sets and clutch situations cannot be overlooked.

Furthermore, the match's surface will be a pivotal factor. Stebe's preference for indoor hard courts contrasts with Piros' strength on clay. While overall head-to-head factors lean towards Piros due to his higher win rate and competitive experience, Stebe's tenacity in crucial moments may tip the scale in his favor.

Given these dynamics, the upcoming match appears exceptionally close, with Stebe's slightly superior performance under pressure marginally favoring him as the likely winner. Nonetheless, Piros' experience and consistent win record make him a formidable contender. The match promises an engaging battle with Stebe as the predicted victor based on current form and situational performance.